Status of Iran’s Nuclear Capabilities
Yesterday, CNN and other media outlets reported that intelligence produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the Pentagon’s intelligence arm, claimed that the strikes did not destroy the core components of Iran's nuclear program and likely only set it back by months. I wanted to share additional opinions that counter these claims.
Andrea Stricker with FDD: Positively, Iran likely cannot weaponize any highly enriched uranium (HEU) and construct nuclear devices any time soon. During its strikes, Israel damaged Tehran’s weaponization capabilities extensively, meaning Iran may not have the ability to construct nuclear devices in the immediate term, even if it sought to. Jerusalem struck numerous weaponization facilities, equipment, atomic weapons components, and documentation and assassinated at least 14 nuclear scientists…Netanyahu also noted on June 22 that Israel has intelligence on the whereabouts of the missing HEU. Thus, Israel or the United States may conduct further strikes to eliminate the material. Jerusalem has penetrated Iran’s atomic weapons program and activities so deeply that Israel would likely detect Iran building nuclear weapons, an action that would probably invite additional, massive U.S. and Israeli strikes.
David Albright, President and Founder Institute for Science and International Security:
With residual stocks of 60 percent and hidden centrifuges, Iran retains an ability to breakout and produce weapon-grade uranium. We agree, but this is an on-going process, where it is necessary to continue hunting down these items or make a deal where Iran has to give them up. But the situation is dynamic and not static. One change today, after the completion of the DIA report, is intelligence evidence that more enriched uranium stocks are in the rubble than believed just yesterday. Considering the damage to Iran's three known enrichment facilities, the destruction of Iran's centrifuge manufacturing capabilities, its uranium conversion facility, uranium metal production plant, and other facilities involved in its nuclear weaponization process, reconstituting these capabilities will take significant time, investment, and energy to return to its previous state before the war or build nuclear weapons.
Iran has likely lost close to 20,000 centrifuges at Natanz and Fordow, creating a major bottleneck in any reconstitution effort.
Moreover, there has been considerable damage to Iran’s ability to build the nuclear weapon itself. Further complicating matters for Iran, the country is under intense scrutiny and observation from the United States and Israel. Any major effort to reconstitute its capabilities may well be met with further strikes.
…to reduce what has happened to a worst case assessment, while it has value, is misleading to say the least.
For more detail: Post-Attack Assessment of the First 12 Days of Israeli Strikes on Iranian Nuclear Facilities
Barak Ravid with Axios: Israeli intelligence services believe U.S. and Israeli strikes caused "very significant" damage to Iran's nuclear facilities, with some officials perplexed by a leaked U.S. intelligence report that suggested otherwise.
The classified DIA report was based on early intelligence from just one agency, and the overall picture remains muddled — especially with Iran itself still assessing the damage and weighing its next moves.
An Israeli official with direct knowledge of intelligence on Iran told Axios that intercepted communications suggest Iranian military officials have been giving false situation reports to the country's political leadership — downplaying the extent of the damage.
Two Israeli officials also claimed that intelligence shows Iran's stockpile of 60% and 20% enriched uranium is now buried beneath rubble at Isfahan and Fordow — and it's unclear whether Iran will be able to recover it in the near future
Two Israeli officials also claimed that intelligence shows Iran's stockpile of 60% and 20% enriched uranium is now buried beneath rubble at Isfahan and Fordow — and it's unclear whether Iran will be able to recover it in the near future.
Prime Minister's Office on behalf of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission (IAEC): The devastating US strike on Fordo destroyed the site’s critical infrastructure and rendered the enrichment facility inoperable. We assess that the American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities, combined with Israeli strikes on other elements of Iran’s military nuclear program, has set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years. The achievement can continue indefinitely if Iran does not get access to nuclear material
Situational Update
Minutes after a US brokered ceasefire went into effect, Iran launched another salvo of missiles, with one directly hitting a residential building in Be’er Sheva, in Israel’s south. Four innocent Israelis were killed.
Cpl. Eitan Zacks, 18, a trainee in the elite Multidomain unit who was at home for a paramedics course that had been held remotely due to the security situation; and his mother, Michal Zacks, 50;
Noa Boguslavsky, 18, and a 12th-grade student from nearby Arad (and identified as Eitan’s girlfriend)
Naomi Shaanan, a Beersheba resident, who was well known in the city for taking part in daily protests calling for the release of the hostages held in Gaza.
Eitan, Noa and Michal had entered their reinforced safe room upon hearing an initial siren, but left after they received an all-clear. They did not have time to return to the safe room following a second siren that came immediately preceding the impact
Operation Rising Lion Summary
The Institute for the Study of War summarizes the operations accomplishments:
Israel pursued a campaign to destroy Iran’s nuclear program and with US support was largely successful in doing so. Israel also pursued two supporting lines of effort to limit Iran’s retaliation and create an off-ramp by creating conditions that would pressure Iran into terminating the conflict. Israel pressured Iran by creating a credible threat of regime destabilization.
The limited nature of strikes against internal security institutions suggests that the IDF sought to demonstrate a credible threat to regime stability rather than topple or meaningfully destabilize the regime. A focused, well-designed regime destabilization campaign would have systematically destroyed regime institutions, which did not happen.
Iran’s enrichment capabilities have been “effectively destroyed,” according to the Institute for Science and International Security. Iran still retains stockpiles of enriched uranium, but its ability to enrich these stockpiles further will be complicated by the loss of so many centrifuges and facilities.
Iran’s inability to accurately strike military or energy infrastructure highlights the limited accuracy of its ballistic missiles. The high Israeli intercept rate made it even more difficult for Iran to accurately target key Israeli infrastructure. Israel nonetheless faced sustained missile attacks against key population centers that was unprecedented in the October 7 War.
As the cease fire went in to effect, the total impact from Israel’s operation is as follows:
29 Israelis killed — all but one of them civilians — and wounded over 3,000 people.
3,238 people were hospitalized, including 23 who were seriously injured, 111 moderately, 2,933 lightly, 138 who suffered from acute anxiety, and another 30 whose conditions have not been determined.
More than 9,000 people have been displaced from their homes, dozens of which were damaged or destroyed by the Iranian attacks.
Over 20 senior Iranian military commanders were killed and at least 14 nuclear scientists were eliminated
The Times of Israel reports: An Israeli airstrike in Iran killed Saeed Izadi, the head of the Palestine Corps in the IRGC Quds Force, who funded and armed Hamas ahead of the terror group’s October 7 onslaught as part of a multi-front plan to destroy Israel. Izadi was “one of the architects” of Hamas’s October 7, 2023, onslaught, “and among the few who knew of it prior to its execution,” the IDF said. The IDF said that Izadi was responsible for directing Hamas forces in Lebanon during the war, and “he made it his mission to rebuild Hamas’s military wing and ensure the group remained the ruling power in Gaza.”
Iran launched between some 550 ballistic missiles and around 1,000 drones at Israel during the war, according to the IDF.
Most of the missiles were intercepted by Israeli and American air defenses at an interception rate of around 90 percent
At least 31 ballistic missile impacts were reported in populated areas or critical infrastructure sites, including a power station in southern Israel, an oil refinery in Haifa, and a university in central Israel. Dozens of other missiles struck open areas, without causing significant damage.
Nearly 99% of the drones that had posed a threat to Israel — around 500 — were intercepted by the Israeli Air Force with fighter jets, helicopters, and ground-based air defense systems; the Israeli Navy with missile boats; and the 5114th Spectrum Battalion with electronic warfare means, according to the military.
Iran at the start of the war was estimated to have some 2,500 ballistic missiles and many thousands of drones. The military has estimated that some two-thirds of Iran’s ballistic missile launchers, around 250, were destroyed in strikes, along with around 1,000 of the missiles. This leaves Iran with around 1,000 to 1,500 ballistic missiles, and only around 100 or so launchers, according to IDF estimates.
Roughly 65 percent of Iran’s launchers were neutralized. Airfields, storage depots, and radar installations across western Iran were wiped out.
John Spencer writes: Beyond destroying physical assets, Israel achieved a broader strategic goal: dismantling Iran’s proxy umbrella. For decades, Iran’s nuclear ambitions served a political and military purpose: creating a protective shield under which its terror network could operate. That network included Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis and Shiite-backed groups in Iraq and Syria…Since October 7, Hamas has been severely degraded down to a shadow government and guerrilla force with limited to no military capability. During the war with Iran, Hezbollah did not fire a single rocket. The Houthis, who launched dozens of missiles at Israel in the months prior, managed only two over the course of the 12-day campaign. Iran’s entire regional strategy, built over years, crumbled under pressure. It has been defanged.
The true winner of this war is not only Israel or the United States. It is the international system. A nuclear threshold state was pushed back. A regime that has fueled terror across continents has been checked. And the principle that force can be used morally and precisely, in defense of peace, was upheld.
Listen
[WOW] The Washington Post has published an audio file in which Mossad agents contact 20 IRGC commanders and give them 12 hours to flee Iran, or they and their families will be killed. The Washington Post obtained an audio recording and transcript of one such call, which took place the same day, June 13, that Israel began its bombardment of Iran.
Operation Rising Lion Related Articles
Matti Friedman: After the Bombs with The Free Press
Dozens of Israelis wounded by Iranian ballistic missiles, and whole blocks in ruins in several cities.
News sinks in of the dramatic U.S. Air Force attacks against the beating heart of the Axis of Resistance… there’s a feeling of decisive change.
If these strikes… succeed in destroying Iran’s nuclear program… today could be remembered… as a turning point.
Since 1979, the regime has desired Israel’s destruction as a matter of theological principle.
The media framing of Israel’s dilemma as an “Israeli-Palestinian” conflict has always been a simplistic fiction… the most powerful driver among Israel’s enemies has… been Iran.
Iran-funded rocket arsenals appeared in the hands of religious fanatics who… declared their desire not for peace but for death.
The brutal Gaza war… launched by one of Iran’s clients and joined by several others.
At night, the underground stations of the Tel Aviv light rail are full of families who come to sleep there, as if this were London in the Blitz.
“Working with an Israeli director was like another page being added to my dossier in the courts of the Islamic Republic,” Farahani said.
“There’s a connection between us that transcends this war… incredible potential between these two peoples.”
Our pilots fly freely in Iranian skies. Our streets are littered with Iranian shrapnel.
If the lines have been blurred in this way, maybe they can be blurred in others.
Trump Changes History With Iran Strike by John Podhoretz with Commentary Magazine
On October 7, 2023, an Iranian client called Hamas invaded Israel, killed 1,200 people, injured 3,500 more, and took 251 hostages. On October 8, 2023, an Iranian front group called Hezbollah began firing rockets at Northern Israel on Iran’s direction. On October 19, 2023, an Iranian proxy called the Houthis fired three drones at Israel. In April 2024, Iran launched 300 drones and other projectiles at Israel in the first direct attack from Persia in the Jewish state’s 77-year history. On October 1, 2024, Iran launched 200 ballistic missiles at Israel.
October 7 and its aftermath is Iran’s war. The purpose was to reverse what seemed like an inexorable march to a new Middle East in which Arab countries were seeking friendlier relations with the Jewish state.
Iran wanted to make Israel suffer, and look like a loser, and separate it not only from potentially new friends but from old friends as well.
Trump gave Iran a chance to stand down and stand back. And another. And another. He had only a single non-negotiable point on his term sheet—Iran giving up all ability to enrich uranium to make a bomb.
After 10 days of war from Israel did astonishing pinpoint damage in activating an attack inside Iran that was literally 20 years in the making came a single night of American mega-assault.
Trump made clear he was willing to be one-and-done if Iran would come to the table and accept terms that would bring this barbarous 20-month jihad to a close.
Iran is a thousand times weaker today than it was just 11 days ago, and so many of its strategic assets and strategic thinkers have been destroyed in that time it’s not clear what capability the regime still might possess.
Trump said he ends wars. And what happened last night was Trump ending this evil war of Iran’s, either right now or after more pain causes the mullahs to cry uncle.
For Israel didn’t start this war either. It was launched, by Iran and its catamites, on October 7.
The Three Dramatic Consequences of Israel’s Attack on Iran by Eliot A. Cohen with The Atlantic
“Battles are the principal milestones in secular history,” Winston Churchill observed… “Modern opinion resents this uninspiring truth … But great battles, won or lost, change the entire course of events.”
Iran’s war with Israel is rooted in the Islamic Republic’s inveterate hostility to the Jewish state. It has consisted of multiple campaigns… But three great events—the smashing of Hezbollah, the Syrian revolution that overthrew the Iranian-aligned regime, and now a climactic battle waged by long-range strikes and Mossad hit teams in Tehran—are changing the Middle East.
Israel’s current campaign is built around two realities… that the Iranian government is determined to acquire nuclear weapons and cannot be deterred… and that Israel reasonably believes itself to be facing an existential threat.
The Iranian regime was happy to delay and temporize, but its destination was clearly visible in the expanding overt and covert programs to enrich uranium, design warheads, and develop delivery systems.
It takes a particular kind of idiocy or bad faith to disregard the speeches, propaganda, and shouts of “death to Israel.”
The first is the emergence of a distinct mode of warfare… combining large-scale and systematic use of assassinations and sabotage with nearly simultaneously precision strikes.
The second is the way that the wars that began with Hamas’s attack… have reshaped the Middle East. Iran’s position had been drastically weakened through the loss of its proxy forces… and now this current round of attacks has the potential to jeopardize the Iranian regime itself.
All that the regime has left are its mechanisms of repression. Ultimately, those will not suffice to sustain it.
A form of regime change may come—possibly through public upheaval… or a strongman… who will take Iran in a different direction.
The Western world has reason… to be grateful to Israel for doing the “dirty work” of smashing Iran’s nuclear program.
Which brings us to… the characteristically over-the-top, bellicose rhetoric of Donald Trump.
Trump’s turnaround is less surprising when one considers his political gifts, among them a feral instinct for weakness.
He has aspirations to be not a warlord… but a kind of peacemaker… a different kind of Iran—if not a democratic one, then a tamed dictatorship—would be open for deals, and he would gladly make them.
He has… supported actions that are doing far more than those of any of his predecessors to eliminate a threat… and that would be infinitely worse if left unchecked.
Link: The Three Dramatic Consequences of Israel’s Attack on Iran
Israel/Middle East Related Articles
Benjamin Netanyahu vs. Qassem Soleimani by Elliot Kaufman with The WSJ
“I have assembled for you six armies outside Iran… Any enemy… will have to go through these six armies” Soleimani told Iran’s army chiefs.
Yet Israel did.
Of Soleimani’s six armies, only the Houthis and Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Units have escaped.
Israel fought through Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Hezbollah, wiping out their leadership… leaving the Assad regime in Syria to crumble.
Israel, the size of New Jersey, was devastating Iran’s nuclear program… Iran, twice the size of Texas… doesn’t even try to take on the Israel Defense Forces.
“The missile math now is very much in Israel’s favor,” says Gen. David Petraeus… “They can do anything they want, just about.”
“The nuclear program will not only be destroyed now, and all of it, but Israel won’t allow it to happen again.”
“Mr. Netanyahu has long wanted to fight Iran because that way he can stay in office forever.”
“The truth may be closer to the opposite: Benjamin Netanyahu has been driven to gain and keep power to stave off Iran’s nuclear ambitions.”
“We can’t leave it for the next generation,” he said… “because there may not be a next generation.”
On June 13, Mr. Netanyahu took his attack plan to the cabinet… and approved it unanimously.
Soleimani was mostly right… But he couldn’t imagine that Israel would fight through Iran’s proxies and withstand slaughter… and emerge with enough in the tank… and Mr. Netanyahu still in the driver’s seat.
Now, Israel’s prime minister can realize a vision of his own—and fulfill his historical responsibility.
Meanwhile, Hamas is Killing Civilians Who Seek Food by Elliott Abrams in Council on Foreign Relations
While the war between Israel and Iran is drawing attention away from Gaza, it’s worth seeing what Hamas is doing: killing civilians who seek food.
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has been distributing food inside Gaza. What is the Hamas response? To kill Gazans who need that food for their families.
People lining up for food have been shot and many others scared away. Hamas’s reasoning is simple: control of food is control of the population for Hamas, a source of power as well as cash.
Hamas is killing many civilians looking for a sack of flour on the pretext that they are collaborating with the American food distribution centers.
It is not only Israel that is creating this terrible reality; Hamas is complicit in this industry of death, hunting down the hungry with the death squads it calls Al-Sahm.
Hamas itself has made clear threats. On June 11, a bus carrying two dozen workers traveling to a distribution center was attacked by Hamas and eight killed.
In those efforts to stop the food distribution, it has the support of various United Nations agencies including UNRWA.
Hamas is also killing Gazans lining up at UN sites to get food.
The United Nations is acting as Hamas is: it would apparently rather not see food distributed than see it brought in outside UN channels.
UNRWA staff members in Gaza actually participated in the October 7, 2023 massacre, and Hamas members, including a top commander, were UNRWA officials.
It is shameful that the denunciations focus on GHF rather than on the Hamas killings of Gazans lined up for food.
Antisemitism
[MUST READ REPORT] False Flags and Fake MAGA: How Foreign and Inauthentic Networks use Fake Speech to Destabilize the Right from Within from the Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI)
Amid the escalating war with Iran, pro‑Kremlin and Iranian state‑linked propaganda nodes flooded American social media while masquerading as MAGA loyalists. Their coordinated playbook delegitimized nearly every headline as a false narrative, amplified Tehran’s lines, and accused Donald Trump of complicity and moral corruption. All these actions were in service of undermining American conservative unity during a time of international instability.
These coordinated efforts exploited what NCRI identifies as a false flag reflex - a conditioned response that turns major atrocities into a trigger for trending conspiracy claims.
Key Findings include
Hostile Information Architecture: The NCRI-identified network operates as a hostile influence system structured to degrade U.S. public trust, distort crisis perception, and redirect right-wing audiences toward foreign adversary objectives through coordinated disinformation and narrative warfare.
Engineered Malicious Narratives
Foreign Narrative Seeders: A triad of foreign-linked amplifiers –seeded crisis narratives immediately following each event.
Bot-Like Influence Loops: Network analysis flagged 24% of participants in “false flag” narratives as inauthentic, including clusters of bot accounts created on April 26 and October 28, 2022, suggesting long-term prepositioning for influence operations.
The Asset-Adjacency Model: The influence network fuses coordinated foreign assets with a tier of marginal, non-credible domestic actors. Figures such as Fuentes, Shields, and Hinkle are not strategic agents, but engagement-dependent personalities operating at the periphery of MAGA discourse.
Psychological Resonance: These attitudes mirror emerging pro-Iran, anti-Trump messaging in “Fake MAGA” spaces and suggest that exposure to foreign-influenced networks may be coloring not just discourse, but psychological thresholds for endorsing political violence.
To isolate narrative origins and trace ideological fingerprints, NCRI mapped the keyword lattice surrounding “false flag” posts…These findings suggest a playbook redeployed to exploit new violence and reframe emergent narratives through a foreign lens.
Assessment: NCRI assesses that the coordinated influencer ecosystem promoting false flag narratives and attacks on Donald Trump is executed by inauthentic, MAGA-branded accounts and aligns with the tactical patterns of Kremlin-backed information operations: Exploitation of domestic schisms, impersonation of trusted voices, and weaponization of divisive narratives in order to destabilize political coalitions and erode institutional trust.
What appears as grassroots outrage is often a staged cascade: beginning with foreign-linked accounts injecting crisis narratives, then rapidly picked up by a layer of ideologically unmoored influencers whose engagement relies on algorithmic volatility rather than real constituencies.
NCRI therefore assesses that the observed campaigns are not isolated bursts, but part of an enduring architecture of coordinated inauthentic behavior. As long as foreign seed accounts, bot-laden amplification rings, and engagement-hungry fringe influencers remain intertwined, every future domestic shock will provide a fresh launchpad for destabilizing narratives.
Link to Full Report: False Flags and Fake MAGA
The hilarious collapse of the cult of the keffiyeh by Brendan O'Neill with Spiked Magazine
Don’t you just hate it when brown people reject your white saviourism?
These valiant few from the US, the UK, Ireland and elsewhere had planned to trek to Rafah in Gaza to save poor, hungry Palestinians from Evil Israel. But they came unstuck in Egypt… where local folk ridiculed them, pelted them with plastic bottles and roundly told them to fuck off.
The Global March to Gaza has been thwarted by angry Arabs… who don’t want their nation used as a stage for moral masturbation by every puffed-up Palestine fetishist of the West.
The Global March to Gaza consisted of 4,000 people from 54 countries… [who] really thought they could finger-wag a war out of existence.
All I’m hearing is I, me, mine. Was it really Gaza they wanted to liberate or their own morbidly obese egos?
Their cloying pity for Arabs crashed against the reality of Arab self-respect.
There will never be a better representation of the phoney virtue and haughty self-regard of the ‘pro-Palestine’ set than this dystopic image of Westerners in Arab headgear screaming ‘shame’ at real Arabs.
They were ‘shocked’ by their treatment. Why? Anyone with even a fleeting knowledge of Arab politics will know that Egyptian officialdom is iffy about the Palestine issue.
The childish moral fables that the West’s white-saviour classes tell themselves… took one hell of a beating in Egypt.
The children are starving, the women’s breasts are empty – prove to the world that Arabs have ‘white hearts’ and let me pass, he says. This is the ‘pro-Palestine’ movement’s Four Lions moment.
The cult of the keffiyeh is in trouble. Many can now see that the aim of this activism is not to feed people in Gaza but to feed the vanity of Westerners bored with their privileged lives.
It’s an orgy of Orientalism in which the activist class cosplays as Arabs because they think it’s lame and shameful to be white.
Cry more, Israelophobes – your sanctimony is crashing against the shores of reality.
Hostage Update (no change)
There are now currently 49 hostages taken on 10/7 currently in captivity in Gaza (there are 50 hostages remaining in total)
Of the 50 hostages still theoretically in Gaza
28 hostages have been confirmed dead and are currently being held in Gaza
Thus, at most, 22 living hostages could still be in Gaza. It has been reported that only 20 are actually alive.
Hamas is now holding the body of 1 IDF soldier who was killed in 2014 (Lt. Hadar Goldin’s body remains held in the Gaza Strip)
20 hostages remain in captivity and have not been declared dead.
2 hostages are Americans: Meet the Two American Hostages Still Held By Hamas:
Itay Chen died on October 7 defending civilians living in an agricultural area near the Gaza borde
Omer Neutra was killed when his team drove two miles to the border, where Hamas militants ambushed his tank with rocket-propelled grenades.
On October 7th, a total of 251 Israelis were taken hostage.
During the ceasefire deal in November of 2023, 112 hostages were released.
38 hostages were released in the first phase of the 2025 cease fire agreement (including 5 Thai nationals)
202 hostages in total have been released or rescued
The bodies of 47 hostages have been recovered, including 3 mistakenly killed by the military as they tried to escape their captors.
8 hostages have been heroically rescued by troops alive
Casualties (+7)
According to the Times of Israel: Seven soldiers were killed during fighting in the southern Gaza Strip after an armored vehicle they were in was hit by an explosive device on Tuesday, marking one of the deadliest incidents for the Israel Defense Forces in months.
Lt. Matan Shai Yashinovski, 21
Staff Sgt. Ronel Ben-Moshe, 20
Staff Sgt. Niv Radia, 20
Sgt. Ronen Shapiro, 19
Sgt. Shahar Manoav, 21
Sgt. Maayan Baruch Pearlstein, 20
Staff Sgt. Alon Davidov, 21
1,922 Israelis have been killed including 879 IDF soldiers and police since October 7th
Iran: 28 Israelis have been killed in Israel from missiles attacks from Iran
The South: 440 IDF soldiers during the ground operation in Gaza have been killed. The toll includes three police officers (two of which were killed in a hostage rescue mission) and two Defense Ministry civilian contractors.
The North: 133 Israelis (85 IDF soldiers) have been killed during the war in Northern Israel
The West Bank: 66 Israelis (27 IDF and Israeli security forces)
Additional Information (according to the IDF):
6,012 (+10 since Sunday) IDF soldiers have been injured since the beginning of the war, including at least 895 (+2 since Sunday) who have been severely injured.
2,743 (+5 since Sunday) IDF soldiers have been injured during ground combat in Gaza, including at least 528 (+1 since Sunday) who have been severely injured.
The Gaza Casualty Count: According to unverified figures from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, 55,959 total deaths have been reported, with a civilian/combatant ratio: 1:1.
[MUST READ] Report: Questionable Counting: Analysing the Death Toll from the Hamas-Run Ministry of Health in Gaza by Andrew Fox with The Henry Jackson Society
Regular sources include JINSA, FDD, IDF, AIPAC, The Paul Singer Foundation, The Institute for National Security Studies, the Alma Research and Education Center, Yediot, Jerusalem Post, IDF Casualty Count, algemeimer, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, Institute for the Study of War, Tablet Magazine, Mosaic Magazine, Commentary, The Free Press, The Jewish Institute for Strategy and Security, and the Times of Israel